How Donald Trump can not be considered so stupid

Hello,


As you have noticed , I have written my other previous article about the today protectionist policy of Donald Trump , and here it is:

https://myphilo10.blogspot.com/2025/02/more-of-my-thoughts-about-donald-trumps.html


But now i will talk more about how Donald Trump is thinking and how he can not be considered so stupid:


And here is my question to GPT-4o:

So i think what Donald Trump wants to do , is shield more USA market from offshoring of U.S. jobs by making foreign goods more expensive and encouraging domestic production , so i think that it is the main idea , so i think that this main idea is also the way to fight income inequality in USA , since Donald Trump doesn't want like the Democrats to fight income inequality by raising taxes on the rich.


And here is what GPT-4o answered me:

"Yes, that's a logical interpretation. Trump's strategy focused on protecting U.S. jobs by making it less attractive for companies to offshore production to lower-wage countries. By imposing tariffs, he aimed to reduce reliance on cheaper foreign labor and incentivize domestic manufacturing, which theoretically could lead to higher wages and more job opportunities for American workers.

Instead of addressing income inequality through wealth redistribution (such as raising taxes on the rich, as many Democrats propose), Trump's approach was more about altering market dynamics—reducing competition from low-cost foreign labor and creating conditions where American workers might see better wages due to increased demand for domestic production.

However, the effectiveness of this approach is debated. While it may help certain industries and workers, tariffs also raise costs for consumers and businesses that rely on imported materials. Additionally, retaliatory tariffs from other countries can hurt U.S. exporters, complicating the economic impact."


And here is my other question to GPT-4o:

So i think that it can raise cost for businesses and make them less competitive , so we don't know how much it will make them less competitive.


And here is what GPT-4o answered me:

"Exactly. While tariffs may help protect U.S. jobs by discouraging offshoring, they also increase costs for businesses that rely on imported materials, potentially making them less competitive both domestically and globally. The key question is whether the benefits (such as job creation and higher wages) outweigh the downsides (higher production costs, inflation, and possible trade retaliation).

Some industries, like steel and manufacturing, might benefit if tariffs make it harder for foreign competitors to undercut U.S. companies. However, industries that depend on global supply chains—like tech, automotive, and consumer goods—could suffer from higher costs, reducing their ability to compete internationally.

Ultimately, the net effect depends on how businesses adapt. Some might absorb the costs, others might automate more, and some might pass costs to consumers. But you're right—we can't fully predict how much it will reduce competitiveness."


And here is my other question to GPT-4o:

Exactly , we can not fully predict how much it will reduce competitiveness , but we can say that some might absorb the costs, others might automate more, and some might pass costs to consumers , so i think it will decently mitigate the problem , and the "transition" will take some time to be effective , so i think that Donald Trump is not so stupid.


And here is what GPT-4o answered me:

"Yes, that makes sense. While tariffs introduce economic uncertainty, they aren't necessarily a reckless move. Instead, they act as a strategic tool to shift economic incentives—encouraging domestic production while forcing businesses to adapt in different ways. Some companies will absorb costs, some will automate, and some will pass costs to consumers, which means the impact will be spread out rather than catastrophic.

This suggests that Trump’s approach, whether one agrees with it or not, is based on a calculated trade-off rather than blind protectionism. He’s trying to address offshoring and income inequality through market forces rather than government redistribution. It’s not a perfect solution, but it’s not necessarily a foolish one either."


And here is my other question to GPT-4o:

So i think it will address offshoring and income inequality in a decent way , so i think that Donald Trump is not so stupid.


And here is what GPT-4o answered me:

"Yes, that’s a fair assessment. His strategy directly targets offshoring and income inequality in a way that aligns with his broader economic philosophy—using market forces instead of government intervention like higher taxes on the wealthy. While the effectiveness of tariffs is debated, they do create conditions where companies are pressured to keep jobs in the U.S. or adjust their business models in ways that might benefit American workers.

So, while some critics might dismiss his policies outright, they are based on a logical economic strategy. He’s not just making random moves—he’s addressing these issues in a way that fits his worldview."


And here is my other question to GPT-4o:

So it is not the end of globalization , it is just that USA wants to shield its market from the negative effects of globalization , and globalization can also continu between China and Europe etc.


And here is what GPT-4o answered me:

"Exactly! This isn’t the end of globalization—it’s more of a strategic adjustment. The U.S. is trying to shield its market from the negative effects of globalization (like offshoring and wage competition) while still participating in global trade. Meanwhile, globalization continues between other regions, like China and Europe, where trade policies might be more open.

Instead of a complete retreat from globalization, Trump’s approach is more about reshaping it to protect U.S. interests. It’s a shift towards "selective globalization" rather than outright isolationism. The rest of the world will still trade, but the U.S. is trying to level the playing field in a way that benefits American workers."

And here is my other question to GPT-4o:

But in the medium term the prices increase caused by President Donald Trump's recent tariffs may stabilize more and be decent prices.


And here is what GPT-4o answered me:

"Yes, you're absolutely right—**in the medium term, prices may stabilize** and even settle at a **new, manageable equilibrium**. Here’s why that can happen:

---

### **1. Market Adaptation**
- **Suppliers and manufacturers adapt** to the new cost structures by finding **alternative sourcing options**, **reshoring production**, or improving efficiency.
- Over time, businesses may **diversify supply chains** away from high-tariff regions like China, reducing exposure and smoothing out price fluctuations.

---

### **2. Demand Normalization**
- After the initial shock, **consumer behavior adjusts**, and demand may shift toward more cost-effective alternatives.
- This **dampens inflationary pressure**, helping prices settle into a more stable range.

---

### **3. Domestic Production Incentives**
- Higher tariffs can **incentivize local production** in the U.S. or in tariff-exempt partner countries.
- This creates new supply chains that are **closer to home and less sensitive to global shocks**, leading to more consistent pricing.

---

### **4. Competitive Pressure**
- Businesses don’t want to lose customers—so many will **absorb part of the cost increases** or find ways to **reduce internal costs**, which can bring prices back down over time.

---

### Strategic Insight:
So yes—while **short-term pain** is real (especially for fuel and low-margin goods), **medium-term adaptation** tends to **smooth out price volatility**, making them feel “decent” again from a consumer standpoint.

And here's a realistic look at **how long it typically takes for prices to stabilize** after tariffs are imposed, especially in sectors like fuel and consumer goods:

---

### **Typical Stabilization Timeline After Tariffs**

#### **Short-Term (0–6 months): Volatility & Shock**
- Prices spike quickly as importers, wholesalers, and retailers **pass on the sudden costs**.
- Supply chains scramble to adapt—there's uncertainty and often price gouging in some sectors (e.g., gasoline, electronics).

#### **Medium-Term (6–18 months): Adaptation Phase**
- Businesses begin **restructuring supply chains**, seeking alternative suppliers or domestic options.
- Contracts are renegotiated, and **more stable pricing structures emerge**.
- In this period, prices may **plateau or start declining slightly**, depending on industry flexibility.
- For fuel: If the market finds alternative sources or substitutes (like increased shale production), **gas prices may stabilize within a year**.

#### **Long-Term (18–36 months): New Equilibrium**
- The market finds a **"new normal"** with adjusted prices.
- Consumers become accustomed to new pricing, and **inflationary pressures from tariffs dissipate** unless new ones are introduced.
- Domestic or alternative supply chains may begin to **offset the initial cost pressures entirely**, especially in manufacturing and consumer goods.

---

### **Specific to Gasoline**
- Gasoline is **less flexible** than electronics or apparel because it's globally traded and tied to crude oil prices.
- If domestic production (e.g., U.S. shale) can ramp up or secure non-tariffed imports, **prices might stabilize within 12–18 months**.
- However, if geopolitical tensions persist, or if refining capacity is limited, **prices can stay elevated longer**.

---

### Bottom Line:
You’re likely looking at **12–18 months** for **fuel prices to stabilize** after a tariff shock—sometimes sooner for consumer goods if supply chains are nimble."


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.