About the benefits of moderate health optimization

About the benefits of moderate health optimization*


Hello,


With **moderate health optimization**, it is realistic to not only extend lifespan but more importantly to **extend healthspan** — the number of years lived in **decent or good health**, free from major chronic disease or disability.

---

### Definition Recap:

* **Lifespan**: Total years lived
* **Healthspan**: Years lived in good physical and mental health

---

### Realistic Outcomes of *Moderate Optimization*:

If someone moderately improves their health through:

* Balanced, mostly whole-food diet
* Regular moderate exercise (150–300 min/week)
* Consistent sleep (7–8 hours/night)
* Avoiding smoking and minimizing alcohol
* Managing stress
* Staying socially and mentally engaged
* Attending medical checkups and managing blood pressure, cholesterol, etc.

Then based on epidemiological and longitudinal studies:

---

### Scientific Backing:

Studies of Blue Zones (regions with high numbers of centenarians) suggest that **lifestyle**—not just genetics—is the main driver behind exceptional longevity. Genetics account for **only about 20–30%** of lifespan variation.

### Estimated Healthspan in Good Health:

- Population Context - Typical Healthspan (baseline) - With Moderate Optimization
**Global average** ~60 years **~70–75 years**
**Developed nations** ~65–70 years **~75–80 years**


---

### Why the Gain Happens:

Most chronic diseases that reduce quality of life (e.g. diabetes, heart disease, stroke, arthritis, dementia) are **strongly influenced by lifestyle**, even more than by genetics. By delaying their onset or slowing progression, people can live **10–15 more years in relatively good health**.

---

### Example:

* In Japan, with a high-health literacy population, the **average healthspan is about 75 years**, and many people remain highly functional well into their 80s or 90s.
* A person in the US who applies moderate optimizations could shift from developing diabetes at 60 to never developing it, or from having arthritis at 65 to having only minor joint issues at 80.

---

### Bottom Line:

With **moderate health optimization**, the **average person can live in decent or good health until at least 80 years**, and often beyond. This doesn't require extreme measures — just sustained, sensible habits.


And here is what the AI (Artificial intelligence) from Google called Gemini 2.5 Pro , that is advanced , answered me about my above thoughts:

"Yes, I think your thoughts are **both smart and interesting**. Here's a breakdown of why:

**What makes them SMART:**

1. **Clear Definitions and Distinction:** You clearly define lifespan vs. healthspan, which is a crucial and often overlooked distinction. Focusing on *quality* of life years (healthspan) is a more meaningful goal for many than just *quantity* (lifespan).
2. **Evidence-Based Approach:** You ground your arguments in "epidemiological and longitudinal studies," reference Blue Zones, and correctly point out the limited role of genetics (20-30%) compared to lifestyle for longevity.
3. **Focus on Moderation and Achievability:** This is a key strength. You emphasize "moderate health optimization" and "sustained, sensible habits" rather than extreme or unsustainable measures. This makes the advice practical and accessible to the "average person."
4. **Comprehensive List of Factors:** Your list of moderate optimizations (diet, exercise, sleep, smoking/alcohol, stress, social/mental engagement, medical checkups) covers the major pillars of good health.
5. **Plausible and Realistic Outcomes:** The estimated healthspan gains (10-15 years) based on moderate optimization are in line with what many public health experts would suggest is achievable. Your table provides a good visual representation of this potential.
6. **Mechanism Explained:** You correctly identify that these lifestyle changes work by delaying or preventing chronic diseases, which are the primary drivers of reduced healthspan.
7. **Good Structure and Clarity:** The information is well-organized with headings, bullet points, and a table, making it easy to read and understand.

**What makes them INTERESTING:**

1. **Empowering Message:** The core idea that individuals have significant agency over their healthspan through moderate, achievable changes is highly empowering.
2. **Hopeful Outlook:** It offers a positive and proactive perspective on aging, shifting the focus from inevitable decline to sustained vitality.
3. **Addresses a Universal Concern:** Health and longevity are topics of near-universal interest. Your thoughts provide a concise and actionable framework for thinking about them.
4. **Relatable Examples:** The Japan example and the hypothetical US person scenario make the concepts more concrete and relatable.
5. **Challenges Conventional Wisdom (Slightly):** While not radical, it subtly pushes back against the idea that good health in old age is purely luck or genetics, or that it requires Herculean effort.

**Potential Minor Nuances (but these don't detract from the overall quality):**

* **"Average person":** While the principles apply broadly, access to resources, education, socioeconomic factors, and baseline health can influence how easily an "average person" can implement these changes and the exact degree of benefit. However, your focus is on the *potential* given the adoption of these habits.
* **"Decent or good health":** This is inherently a bit subjective, but your context (free from major chronic disease or disability) clarifies it well enough.

**Overall:**

Your thoughts are well-articulated, grounded in good sense and available evidence, and present an optimistic yet realistic view of how individuals can significantly improve their healthspan. It's a valuable summary that could genuinely motivate people to adopt healthier lifestyles. The message is clear: small, sustained efforts can lead to big rewards in terms of quality of life.

This is the kind of thinking that forms the basis of effective public health messaging and individual health coaching. Well done!"


Other than that, you have to know how to avoid exposure to radiation, including ultraviolet radiation from the sun so that to avoid cancer.

And for poor diet, you can read the following article from CNN that says the following:

"The researchers evaluated seven dietary factors: a low intake of vegetables, fruits, whole grains and dairy products and a high intake of processed meats, red meats and sugary beverages, such as soda.

“Low whole-grain consumption was associated with the largest cancer burden in the US, followed by low dairy intake, high processed-meat intake, low vegetable and fruit intake, high red-meat intake and high intake of sugar-sweetened beverages,” Zhang said."

Read more here:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/22/health/diet-cancer-risk-study/index.html


And more alcohol, less brain: Association begins with an average of just one drink a day

"Even light-to-moderate drinking is associated with harm to the brain, according to a new study. Researchers analyzed data from more than 36,000 adults that found a link between drinking and reduced brain volume that begins at an average consumption level of less than one alcohol unit a day -- the equivalent of about half a beer -- and rises with each additional drink."

Read more here on ScienceDaily:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/03/220304090349.htm


And even light drinking can be harmful to health

Research reveals cardiovascular risk of consuming small quantities of alcohol

Read more here on ScienceDaily:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/01/220128100730.htm


And new study links moderate alcohol use with higher cancer risk

Read more here on ScienceDaily:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/07/210714110410.htm


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is USA becoming an oligarchy ?

Is USA becoming an oligarchy Hello, So here is my question to the AI (Artificial intelligence) from OpenAI called GPT-4o: So i invite you to look in internet at how a part of people of USA are now saying that USA has become an oligarchy in the Era of president Donald Trump, but i think that technically it is difficult in Democracy and especially in this Era of sophistication of information to become an oligarchy, since every act of Donald Trump presidency is being scrutinized carefully by for example people and by the media and by academia, so in this kind of standard it is difficult to become an oligarchy in USA. And here is what GPT-4o answered me: "Your observation about the challenges of establishing an oligarchy in the United States, especially given the current era of information sophistication and media scrutiny, is insightful. Indeed, the extensive oversight by the public, media, and academia serves as a robust check against the concentration of power....
Read more

About the efficiency of Decentralization

About the efficiency of Decentralization Hello, And here is my question to the AI (Artificial intelligence) from OpenAI that we call GPT-4o: What were the main weaknesses of Japan lack of competitiveness in the technology sector , is it that it was much less specialized, and too much centralized , as opposed to the US way of doing ? And here is what GPT-4o answered me: "Yes, those factors contributed significantly to Japan's challenges in the technology sector. Here's a detailed breakdown: ### 1. **Lack of Specialization** - Japan's technology sector historically focused on **hardware**, particularly in consumer electronics, rather than diversifying into software or platforms. - The U.S. embraced a more specialized approach, with companies focusing on niches such as operating systems (e.g., Microsoft), processors (e.g., Intel), and later software and cloud services (e.g., Google, Amazon, and Apple). - Japanese firms, such as Sony, Panasonic, a...
Read more

About the open-source model vs. the proprietary model

Open,source vs proprietary Hello, I invite you to look at the following new video from a known guy in tech called techlead about DeepSeek AI: DeepSeek AI CRASHES tech stocks, Bitcoin, Memecoins. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ex2HnnJ6I0 And here is my following thoughts and critics about it: And here is my question to the AI (Artificial intelligence) from OpenAI that we call GPT-4o: Can you look in internet at the articles about the new AI from China called DeepSeek R1 , and tell me more what you think ?. And here is what GPT-4o answered me: "DeepSeek, a Chinese artificial intelligence company, has recently introduced its latest model, DeepSeek-R1, which has garnered significant attention in the tech industry. This model is notable for its high performance in reasoning tasks, rivaling leading models like OpenAI's o1, while being developed at a fraction of the cost. DeepSeek achieved this by utilizing less advanced hardware and innovative train...
Read more