Beyond competence and the rise of emotional intelligence

Hello,


Now i will talk about an important subject , so i invite you to look at the following video from USA so that you understand:


Hard Work is a Scam: The Harsh Truth About the Corporate World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=av3CHCu2zBM


So i think that the above american is not understanding what is happening , so he is thinking that companies are not meritocratic or the like , but i think he is not understanding the tendency inside the companies of western countries , including US companies, so here is my important thoughts about it:


Here is my question to GPT-4o:

So i think that the tendency today in companies , is that you have not just to do your work , but you have also to be a positive energy that brings wisdom and smartness to the group of the company , so you have to be interesting or liked or pleasant in a kind of way that brings a positive energy , i mean that the psychology of it is important , since it can make the work of the group more productive and of a better quality , so i think that it is the tendency of companies in western countries.


And here is what GPT-4o answered me:

"You're absolutely right in observing a real and growing trend in the workplace—especially in Western countries—where emotional intelligence, team dynamics, and psychological well-being are being recognized as critical to productivity and innovation.

Here’s a more structured way to frame what you’re saying:

---

### **The Modern Workplace: More Than Just Technical Skills**

#### 1. **Emotional Intelligence is Key**

Today, companies are increasingly looking beyond technical competence. Being able to **read the room**, **communicate effectively**, and **navigate interpersonal relationships** has become just as important as job-specific expertise.

#### 2. **Positive Energy and Cultural Fit**

Employers value employees who:

* Bring **optimism** or **calm confidence**
* Contribute to a **supportive team environment**
* Help diffuse tension and solve conflicts constructively

This is what you referred to as “bringing wisdom and smartness”—it’s about elevating not only the task, but the group dynamics too.

#### 3. **Psychology and Productivity**

There’s growing evidence that **team morale affects performance**:

* A motivated, emotionally supported team works better under pressure.
* People are more **creative** and **resilient** in psychologically safe environments.

That’s why companies invest in **team-building**, **diversity and inclusion**, **mental health resources**, and **leadership coaching**—they understand the **psychological environment** shapes outcomes.

#### 4. **The “Whole Person” Approach**

Especially in Western workplaces, there’s a shift toward valuing the “whole person”:

* Your personality
* Your values
* Your ability to bring energy and perspective

Being “liked” isn’t superficial—it often means being **respected, helpful, and engaged** in a way that strengthens the team.

---

### In Summary:

Yes, your insight is very accurate: today’s companies often seek people who not only **do their job**, but who **amplify the performance of others** through their attitude, presence, and emotional awareness. This is especially visible in collaborative, fast-paced, or innovative environments in the West."


And here is my new paper about my above ideas:

---

## The New Workplace Standard: Why Being Smart Isn’t Enough Anymore

*By [Amine Moulay Ramdane]

In today’s professional world—especially in Western countries—the definition of a “great employee” is rapidly evolving. Technical skills still matter. Efficiency is still valued. But increasingly, companies are looking for something more intangible: **a kind of positive energy that uplifts the entire group**.

It’s no longer just about doing your job well. It’s about *how* you do it—and *how you make others feel while doing it*.

---

### Beyond Competence: The Rise of Emotional Intelligence

In the traditional workplace model, being highly skilled and delivering results were enough. You wrote the code. You closed the deal. You shipped the product. Mission accomplished.

But modern teams, shaped by flat hierarchies, fast collaboration cycles, and diverse backgrounds, need more than competence—they need **emotional intelligence**.

Companies now value people who:

* Listen actively and communicate clearly
* Inspire trust and positivity in high-pressure moments
* Help resolve interpersonal friction without drama
* Make their colleagues feel seen, heard, and supported

---

### The Energy You Bring Matters

It might sound a little abstract, but the **psychological atmosphere** of a team has a real, measurable impact. When one person brings grounded confidence, creative thinking, and genuine respect into a room, it *lifts* the whole team.

This isn’t about being overly extroverted or fake. It’s about bringing a kind of **professional presence**—a mix of calm, optimism, and problem-solving wisdom—that helps others do their best work.

Some people call it “cultural fit.” Others call it “vibes.” But whatever the label, **the energy you bring now counts as part of your value**.

---

### The “Whole Human” Approach

More and more, hiring managers are looking for what they call *whole human beings*—people who bring more than just task completion. They bring perspective. They know how to navigate complexity, emotionally and socially. They make work more *human*.

That’s why in many Western companies today, being “liked” isn’t about popularity. It’s about being someone others trust and enjoy collaborating with. It’s a professional asset.

---

### Productivity Is a Team Sport

There’s a growing recognition that productivity is not purely individual. It’s **emergent**—it grows out of trust, shared motivation, and psychological safety.

People do their best work when:

* They feel respected, not micromanaged
* They trust their teammates
* They are encouraged, not criticized, when they take creative risks

So companies that care about performance now invest heavily in **team dynamics**, **mental wellness**, **inclusive culture**, and **purpose-driven leadership**.

---

### The New Norm

This is the new tendency in many companies: you’re not just evaluated on output. You’re evaluated on how your presence, mindset, and communication style impact the group. **Your personality is now part of your professional toolkit.**

It’s a change that may seem subtle—but it’s reshaping everything from hiring practices to leadership development.

---

### Final Thoughts

In a world where innovation relies on fast-moving, high-trust teams, companies don’t just need smart people. They need **wise people**—people who make everyone around them better.

So yes: doing your job well still matters.

But the real question today is:
**Are you also the kind of person who helps others do *their* job better, too?**

---"


And here is what the AI (Artificial intelligence) from Google that is called Gemini 2.5 Pro , that is advanced , answered me about my above paper and ideas:


"Okay, let's break this down.

**Regarding Your Initial Thought:**

* **Is it interesting?** Yes, absolutely. It taps into a widely felt and discussed shift in workplace culture. Many people have experienced or observed what you're describing, so it's relatable and relevant.
* **Is it smart?** Yes, it's a smart observation. You've identified a key trend: the increasing importance of soft skills, emotional intelligence, and cultural contribution beyond just technical proficiency. Recognizing the "psychology of it" and its impact on productivity and quality is insightful. It's not just about being "nice"; it's about fostering an environment where people can do their best work.
* **Accuracy:** Your intuition is spot-on. This is a well-documented trend, especially in knowledge-based industries, collaborative environments, and companies that prioritize innovation. Terms like "emotional intelligence (EQ)," "psychological safety," "cultural fit" (though sometimes controversial in its application), and "employee engagement" are all related to your core idea.

**Regarding GPT-4o's Answer to Your Question:**

* GPT-4o did an excellent job of understanding, validating, and structuring your thought.
* It translated your more intuitive phrasing ("positive energy that bring wisdom and smartness") into established business/psychology concepts ("Emotional Intelligence," "Cultural Fit," "Psychologically Safe Environments").
* The breakdown into points (1-4) and the summary makes your observation very clear and digestible. This is a good example of how AI can help refine and articulate an idea.

**Regarding the Medium-Style Article (Generated by GPT-4o based on your idea):**

This is a very well-crafted article.

* **Interesting?** Definitely. The title is engaging ("Why Being Smart Isn’t Enough Anymore"), and it immediately addresses a core concern for many professionals.
* **Smart?** Yes, the article intelligently expands on your initial premise, weaving in related concepts and providing a clear narrative for the reader.
* **Strengths of the Article:**
* **Clear Structure:** Good flow from introduction to specific points (EQ, Energy, Whole Human, Team Sport) and a strong conclusion.
* **Engaging Language:** Uses relatable examples ("wrote the code," "closed the deal") and clear, concise language. Phrases like "lifts the whole team" and "your personality is now part of your professional toolkit" are effective.
* **Addresses Nuance:** It clarifies that "being liked" isn't superficial popularity but about being "respected, helpful, and engaged." It also subtly distinguishes between "smart" (technical competence) and "wise" (broader contribution).
* **Actionable Takeaway:** The final question ("Are you also the kind of person who helps others do *their* job better, too?") is a powerful call to reflection.
* **Attribution:** Good that it included your name as the author.

**Overall Assessment:**

Your initial thought is indeed interesting and smart. It captures a significant evolution in workplace expectations. GPT-4o then did a commendable job of first structuring that thought and then expanding it into a compelling and well-written article.

The article successfully takes your core insight and presents it in a way that would resonate with a broad professional audience on a platform like Medium. It's accessible, relevant, and thought-provoking.

**Points for Further Thought (if you were to expand on this or write a follow-up):**

* **The "How":** The article explains the "what" and "why" very well. A potential next step could be exploring the "how" – how can individuals cultivate this "positive energy" and "wisdom"? How can companies better identify and nurture these qualities?
* **Potential Pitfalls:** You could explore the potential downsides or misinterpretations. For example:
* The risk of "performative positivity" or pressure to always be "on."
* How "cultural fit" can sometimes be misused to exclude diverse perspectives if not handled carefully.
* The emotional labor aspect and whether it's adequately recognized or compensated.
* **Global Differences:** While you specified "Western countries," briefly acknowledging if this trend is emerging elsewhere or if different cultural values shape it differently could add depth.

**In conclusion: Yes, your thoughts are interesting and smart. The generated paper effectively captures and communicates them. This is a great example of human insight being amplified by AI.**"


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.